Case Study · Google Ads · B2B & B2C eCommerce

+87% Google Ads Revenue.
On 11% Less Spend.

How fixing broken conversion tracking, then rebuilding an account running on multiple poorly managed PMax campaigns, grew Arrow Electrical's Google Ads revenue by 87% and ROAS by 111% - while cutting ad spend by 11%.

Jan - Jul 2026 vs. Jan - Jul 2025
£456K +87% vs before Google Ads Revenue
8.86x +111% vs before Account ROAS
-11.5% Less spent, not more Ad Spend
£16.75 -48% vs before Cost / Conversion

Before & After

Same account. Honest tracking and a real structure underneath it.

Before - Jan to Jul 2025
Google Ads Revenue £244,300
Conversions 1,801
ROAS 420% (4.20x)
Ad Spend £58,242
Cost / Conversion £32.34
VS
After - Jan to Jul 2026
Google Ads Revenue £456,327
Conversions 3,077
ROAS 886% (8.86x)
Ad Spend £51,521
Cost / Conversion £16.75
+£212K More Revenue +87% increase
+1,276 More Conversions +71% increase
-£6.7K Less Ad Spend -11.5% decrease
-48% Lower Cost / Conversion £32.34 → £16.75

The Client

Arrow Electrical is a UK electrical and lighting retailer on BigCommerce, selling everything from exterior lighting and ceiling fixtures to heritage brassware and architectural hardware - to both trade buyers and everyday consumers from the same storefront.

Ben took the account on in January 2025, replacing a freelancer who had been managing it with weak, unprofessional optimisation and declining results.

The Starting Point

The account was running multiple Performance Max campaigns, but with no real management behind them - overlapping targeting, wasted spend, and no product-level segmentation. The client had no visibility into what was actually being done with their budget.

Worse, the numbers the client had been shown weren't even accurate - a fact that only came to light once Ben started digging into how conversions were being tracked.

Numbers That Weren't Real

The account looked like it was working. Nobody could actually prove it.

The previous freelancer had set up a bid strategy that paid an extra £200 in value for every new customer - a reasonable idea, executed badly. The new-customer parameter behind it had never been wired correctly into the conversion action, which meant every revenue and ROAS figure the client had been shown was inflated.

That left two problems to solve at once: an account with no real structure, and a set of historical numbers that couldn't be trusted as a baseline. Fixing the tracking without also fixing the account would have just produced a more accurate picture of a campaign that still wasn't working. Both had to be dealt with.

  • Multiple PMax campaigns were running with no real oversight - overlapping targeting and wasted spend, with no restructuring since setup
  • A new-customer bid modifier was live, but the conversion tracking behind it was broken
  • Revenue and ROAS numbers had been inflated for months, so the client had no accurate baseline to measure against
  • No segmentation between high and low-performing products, and no distinction between B2B and B2C intent

Fix the Truth, Then Fix the Account

Three moves that turned an inflated, unstructured account into one generating £212K more in honestly-tracked revenue - on less spend.

01

Fixed the Tracking Foundation First

Before touching bids, budgets or structure, the new-customer parameter was corrected inside the conversion action, and enhanced conversions with server-side tagging were properly implemented. That meant admitting the old numbers were wrong before anything could be shown to be right.

You can't optimise an account you can't trust the numbers on. Fixing tracking came before fixing anything else, even though it meant the honest baseline looked worse than the inflated one the client had been shown.
02

Rebuilt an Account Running on Poorly Managed PMax Campaigns

The tangle of overlapping, poorly managed PMax campaigns was replaced with a proper mix of Shopping and PMax campaigns split by category - Heritage Brass, Exterior Lighting, Ceiling Lights, Arrow Heroes/Sidekicks, and a Catch All layer for the rest - alongside a dedicated Brand Search campaign and DSA coverage.

Alongside the restructure came a full Google Merchant Center feed rebuild: titles, product descriptions and Google product categories were rewritten across the catalogue to improve relevance and proximity matching in the auction. Every RSA headline and description, and every PMax asset, was refreshed. The whole structure was built to serve both trade (B2B) and consumer (B2C) buyers from the same account, rather than treating Arrow Electrical as a single audience.

03

Automated Product-Level Performance Management

Using Product Hero, products are automatically segmented into high and low performers via campaign labels. Budget flows to the winners and is suppressed on the underperformers without manual guesswork, and Target ROAS bid strategies were tuned per campaign instead of running one blended target across the whole catalogue.

Every product tells you whether it deserves more budget or less. Product Hero just makes sure the account actually listens - every day, not just when someone remembers to check.

The Numbers

Jan - Jul 2026 vs. Jan - Jul 2025, measured on honestly-tracked conversions

Was £244.3K £456.3K Google Ads Revenue +£212K
Was 4.20x 8.86x Account ROAS +111%
Was £58.2K £51.5K Ad Spend -11.5%
Was £32.34 £16.75 Cost / Conversion -48%

Arrow Electrical now generates £212,027 more in honestly-tracked Google Ads revenue than the same period last year, on £6,721 less ad spend. That swing alone moved account ROAS from 4.20x to 8.86x - a result that holds even after the inflated tracking was corrected, not because of it.

£212K More revenue on less spend
vs. the same period in 2025

The Bigger Picture

Google Ads' own numbers are only part of the story - here's what happened store-wide on BigCommerce.

Store-Wide Growth (All Channels, Jan - Jul, YoY)

Visits: 227,696 → 402,473 (+76.76%)

Orders: 4,291 → 5,229 (+21.86%)

Customers: 3,329 → 4,050 (+21.66%)

Total Revenue: £712,010 → £830,674 (+16.67%)

Why the Real Impact Is Bigger Than It Looks

Arrow's buyers, especially on the B2B side, don't convert on the first click. Long consideration windows mean Google Ads' own last-click reporting understates how much of that store-wide growth it actually drove.

At the current run rate, Arrow Electrical is on track for roughly £1.49M in 2026 revenue, up from £1.28M in 2025 - an increase of approximately £212K store-wide.

Three Reasons

01

Honesty Before Optimisation

The broken conversion tracking was fixed before anything else was touched, even though it meant the account's real starting point looked worse than the numbers the client had originally been shown.

02

Structure Over a Tangle of Campaigns

Replacing a cluster of overlapping, poorly managed PMax campaigns with category-specific Shopping and PMax campaigns, backed by a rebuilt Merchant Center feed, gave every product line room to be judged on its own economics.

03

Automated, Continuous Optimisation

Product Hero's automatic performance labelling means budget keeps flowing to winning products and away from losers every day, not just whenever someone remembers to check the account.

"

QUOTE PLACEHOLDER - testimonial from Arrow Electrical to be added once received.

Name, TitleArrow Electrical

Want Results Like These
For Your Brand?

If your Google Ads are stalling, or you're not sure the numbers you're being shown are even real, let's look at what's actually going on.

Apply to Work Together Tell me about your account. I'll get back to you within 12-24 hours.
No retainer lock-in UK-based 200+ client partnerships £50M+ revenue generated